Low productivity and high enteric methane emissions for India’s Dairy Animals

Register Interest
Food & Agriculture Food & Agriculture

Problem Overview: Low nutrient feedstock increases enteric fermentation in animals & lowers yield

India accounts for ~14% of world’s GHG emissions (methane) from livestock, 90% coming from enteric fermentation. Poor quality, high-fibre feedstock can cause 5-7% dietary energy loss leading to 16-26 g per kg of dry matter intake as waste methane, rather than it being converted to milk. For smallholder farmers who own 2-3 cows, feed & fodder account for 70% of the cost of milk production.

Core Bottlenecks: Innovations not tailored to Indian cattle needs

Solutions for biological nitrogen fixation, balanced fertilizer use & soil monitoring exist but the following challenges are still prevalent:

1. Nutrient Deficit Feedstock

Feed & fodder deficit makes it challenging to meet required nutrition for cattle. CAGR for fodder increased by 9-10% while milk prices increased only by 6%.

2. Additives Diet Mismatch

Most feed additive performs when paired with a high starch + low fibre feedstock, designed for Western farms. Indian cattle mainly feeds on dry straw which is high fibre. No proven commercial additive has worked with such diets

3. Small Herd Sizes impact unit economics

Most existing supply distribution channels established in India are at regional level. Smallholder farmers own only 2-3 cows for self sustenance rather than commercial value.

4. Measurability Issue

No MRV to track feed inputs to milk yield & emissions. Lack of data makes tracking results & reporting for credits impossible.

Existing Approaches and Technology Readiness

Feed Additive (3-NOP Bovaer)

Commercially deployed globally but not approved in India

Synthetic & Microbial Additives (eg. Harit Dhara, India)

Demonstrated in operational environment, not yet commercially scaled

Where is the white-space for innovation?

Efforts are ongoing to solve for Indian cattle breeds and make solutions commercially viable. However, no solutions has proven consistent efficacy or been able to solve to make a substantial difference. There is a need for innovation on three fronts:

science-icon.svgScience Breakthrough

India-Specific Additives that work with Indian high fibre diets

briefcase.svgEngineering Innovation

Data Infrastructure is missing. MRV- aggregation + verification stack is needed to enter the carbon credit market. Initiatives like Maharashtra’s M3 signals a government shift towards livestock methane.

briefcase.svgBusiness Model

Cost sharing across various entities from farm to processing, fodder-as-a-service, other innovative methods to enable cost distribution & unlock reach to smallholder farmers. Aggregation is possible when working with FPOs & Cooperatives

How we identify climate innovation opportunities?

Footnotes
  1. Mordor Intelligence (2026,May), India Feed Additives Market Size & Growth
  2. Grandview Research, (2025). Global Animal Feed Additives Market Outlook 2026-2033 
  3. PK Malik, Raghavendra Bhatta, (2026,Feb). Unmasking the methane myth: Why India’s cows emit far less than global estimates, Downtoearth.org
  4. ICAR - Harit Dhara & Tamarin Plus
  5. Arun Raghav (2024, April). Methane Emissions: How Silage can help Environment
  6. Bovaer (2025), DSM Fermenich
  7. Assumptions for calculations: Additive Market Considered 35% + 20% Silage
Profile.svg
Author: Pallavi Salecha

Last Updated On: June 5, 2026

p-ARL Score

6/12

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Regulation & Policy Force
Economic Switching Cost
Infrastructure Readiness
Value Chain Consensus

Regulatory Outlook

National Livestock Mission, Information Network for Animal Productivity & Health Information Network for Animal Productivity & Health GuidelineGuideline